BhamaforObama and the Monkey Idol

hanuman.jpg

(Hindu God Hanuman)

The BBC reports today that a group of Indians are planning to present a statue of the revered Indian monkey God, Hanuman, to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

According to the report:

“The group decided to order the idol after they read a magazine report saying that Mr Obama carried a good luck ‘monkey king’ charm…

Hindus revere monkeys which they believe are descendents of the monkey God Hanuman. The two-foot tall, 15kg gold-polished, brass idol has been made as a present for Mr Obama because “he will be good for India if he becomes the next president,” according to Brij Mohan Bhama, leader of the group.”

One representative of the group said: “Senator Obama has a good luck charm. We don’t know whether it is of Hanuman. But the people here think it is Hanuman.”

Another representative, Brij Mohan Bhama says he is “an ardent supporter of Mr Obama - even his email identification is bhamaforobama.”

“Obama stands for change. We are hoping that he will bring about change so that oil and food prices come down,” he said. “India will progress if he comes to power.”

One Response to “BhamaforObama and the Monkey Idol”

  1. Public Diplomacy » Blog Archive » Why The World Wants Obama Says:

    […] After a few months of observing the global phenomenon that is Obamania, I thought I would put forth a few theories on why Senator Barack Obama is so strongly favored as the next US President by people living outside the US. First, a note on why people outside the US care about the US election at all. After all, they can’t vote, why bother paying attention? The simple answer is: what the US does, both domestically and internationally, effects people around the world. This is not to be taken as arrogance—as if to say that when the US commands everyone falls into line.Rather, the economic, political and military influence that the US has in the world, combined with the processes of globalization that make states more interdependent overall, means that the decisions made by the man sitting in the oval office effect not only Americans, but a great many non-Americans too. This characteristic of the currently ”unipolar” international system is observed by both foreigners and Americans alike.So, if Mr. President is going to effect you, why choose Senator Obama over Senator McCain? And to such a great degree? Here’s a list of five factors I see contributing to foreign publics’ preference for the presumptive Democratic candidate over his Republican counterpart:First, foreign audiences perceive Senator Obama as giving them what they want—a change in US policy. Those people around the world who support Senator Obama believe his promise of change—and want him to make good on it. The second factor flows from the first: Senator Obama is, plain and simple, not George W. Bush. Then again, neither is John McCain. But thanks to the American political spectrum being so narrow, it’s safe to say that Senator Obama represents the antithesis of the current President. The next two factors stem from the same logic: foreigners choose Senator Obama because they want Americans to choose him too, because doing so would send foreigners positive signals about the current character of American society. First is the symbolism of electing an African American President. To elect Obama would paint American society as mature and tolerant. It would demonstrate that the American public possesses qualities that people abroad want it to posses (which are, not coincidentally, qualities that American society itself claims to posses).Second, electing Senator Obama could reaffirm foreign publics’ faith in another element of American society: it’s ability to reason.  Back in 2004, to many people abroad, Americans failed to choose the right candidate. Many abroad didn’t like George W. Bush even in 2000, and chuckled at the irony that a few dimpled chads prevented even a great democracy such as the US’s from holding a fair election.Then, after President Bush started a war in Iraq for what seemed to them like all the wrong reasons, people abroad thought surely Americans will take the opportunity in 2004 to vote in a new president. When Americans re-elected Bush, to a certain degree foreign publics lost faith in the American people to make good choices.In this way, if Americans in 2008 end up electing the candidate that foreign publics see as the “right” choice, Americans could been as rational again. And, as it was stated earlier, given the degree to which the US stands to effect their lives, they certainly want to believe Americans are rational. My final theory on why the world wants Obama is the most mystical of all. Senator Obama’s hybrid, international, identity seems to magically appeal to people all over the world all at the same time—without even trying. His international upbringing makes him into a chameleon, from which foreign publics can pick and choose which “Obama” they identify with most—the Muslim, Asian, or African, etc.  The monkey idol key chain is a great example of this phenomenon.(If only, instead of appealing to people across Asia, Africa and Europe, Senator Obama’s chameleon identity could appeal to people across ”middle America.” Then it would really be magical!)What does this all add up to? If the world gets the candidate they ask for, one thing’s for sure: they will expect President Obama to deliver on his campaign promises of change. If he doesn’t enact the changes he has promised he could loose their support and a considerable amount of US soft power—power that is already on the wane. […]

Leave a Reply